It
has been through the challenge of fulfilling this particular goal that I have
witnessed the greatest impact of my Master of Instruction studies at The
University of Delaware. In choosing the Specialization in Educational
Technology Individualized Component of the M.I. degree, I subjected my future
endeavors in the field of education to a bombardment of imaginative strategies,
materials, gadgets, and more with each infiltration of technological
innovation. It has not been rare for me to feel overwhelmed at times
as I embarked in investigating past and present Educational Technology trends
during my pursuit of improving my instructional practices. Though far from a bad
feeling, this sense of a zillion ideas zooming through my brain has undoubtedly
affected 3M's market ... I find my Post-It Notes having Post-It Notes
of their own! From lined ones to the small, colorful tag versions, the
material presented by University staff, shared by fellow colleagues across the
world, researched by professionals, and refined by all with respect to the
infusion of technology into the educational environment has created a deluge of
brainstorming remnants. From original ideas to thoughtful innovations for
enhancing existing curriculum in any discipline, I find myself constantly
revisiting my individual lesson plans and modifying complex unit plans.
Although this field tends
to breed ideas quite uncontrollably, the real challenge has been the task of
remaining focused in determining valid areas for inquiry and the successful
application to one's own program.
Originating
from the first encounter with Pat Sine at Caesar Rodney High School, my personal
challenge for both classrooms and curricular areas became three-fold: first, to
acquire as much knowledge as possible about computer technology software,
hardware, and instructional systems in an attempt to become 'current'; second,
to investigate and explore 'how' this emerging field would impact or enhance
education, in general, and specifically, my disciplines; and third, to remain
abreast of technological advancements as well as assess their validity in
broaden a child's educational horizons though teacher-improved
instruction. It is unfortunate to mention that although I know I have
addressed these concerns on numerous occasions and have prospered most from this
focal area in the task of empowering my students to be successful in their
endeavors, I oftentimes perceive my efforts as mute points due largely to the
onslaught of technology itself. No sooner do I introduce my students to
one method for implementing technology to simplify their lives, than do I
modify, or retract, that process in exchange for something better.
However, this is the nature of technological beast and its advancement.
During
the Fall Semester of 2000, I enrolled in &
EDUC 685: Multimedia Literacy as
an on-line student. I eagerly advanced through the web-based curriculum,
and delighted in possessing the freedom to control my instruction and knowledge
acquisition. Though I sometimes felt 'out-of-touch' with my
classroom-attending colleagues, our virtual conversations held in the discussion
forum uniquely provided a sense of camaraderie. I became aware through
these postings and the multilit listserv that our professor, Dr. Fred T.
Hofstetter, enjoyed witnessing our sharing of knowledge as he often provided
feed-back concerning these 'talks' and our instruction, in general. Having
since completed this class as well as a doctoral seminar course
exploring Administrative Technology Systems (technological systems used in
delivering, maintaining, gathering, reporting data, specific to education and/or
the distance learning environment), I can fully imagine the satisfaction felt by
Dr. Hofstetter as he observed each of us helping, instructing, and learning in
an environment that he created in a room void of walls. I have also come
to appreciate the sense of collaboration achieved as each faceless student
shared their semester's accomplishments via the multimedia application; though
authored by one individual, each of us shared in another's success and failure as we
communicated power point short-cuts, FTP recommendations, and other issues
surrounding our quest to become literate in educational technology.
Building
upon the desire to become knowledgeable in the specification, selection,
evaluation, and purchasing of instructional technology hardware, software, etc.,
Jeff Fahnoe guided each student of his &
EDUC 639: Instructional Technology
Basics class through the process of developing an instructional technology
plan for their classroom, and writing a grant proposal for obtaining the
required equipment, materials, and training to make the plan, reality. His
relentless pursuit in creating an awareness among the students in the class for
the need of educational technology strategies/equipment and the ease at which
many of them may be implemented into our everyday instruction, granted me the
ability to research, specify, and recommend quality instructional
software/hardware as well as specialized equipment to meet the needs of my
students and administration. My only regret during this reflection process
is that I waited an entire year before scheduling this well organized and
informative course. Mr. Fahnoe not only provided me the ability to
brainstorm the immediacy of simplifying my instruction through technology
integration using appropriate software and hardware, but also gave me the
knowledge and ability to research and seek individuals who may satisfy those
needs and desires across the curriculum.
During
the Winter Session of this past year, I met another individual who
significantly impacted my selection and development of instructional
materials. Paul Hyde introduced the powerful capabilities of the
Macromedia Authorware software as an authoring tool to deliver content,
provide assessment opportunities, and explore curricular links via an
interactive environment. &
EDUC 667: Developing Interactive Education Materials provided the
class with meaningful software exercises in addition to training in image,
sound, and video manipulation. Participants in this graduate class
gained hands-on experience that was immediately applicable in enhancing their
students' learning environment. Building upon existing instructional
design practices, and exploring the recommended design cycle for a technology
infused curriculum, I was able to present my students with yet, another method
of learning content across disciplines.
As I embark upon my daily tasks as a teacher, a professional, and a mentor
during this reflection process, I cannot dismiss the cause-effect relationship
that originally open my eyes to the future of instruction -- utilizing the
capabilities of the Internet and World Wide Web to enhance, enlighten, and
empower. There will always exist those very moments in one's life for a
future-altering revelation, and one of mine occurred during that in-service
presentation by Pat Sine at Caesar Rodney High School. Attempting to
establish connections between my Master of Instruction exposure and personal
instructional experiences in pursuit of tailoring meaningful educational
programs for my students, I realize that it was not necessarily the quantity of
information presented at the session by Pat (and later, during her &
EDUC 632: Using
the Internet for Curriculum Applications course), but rather the avenue she
paved that transported my curricular ideas to their final destination ... the
meaningful educational experience of my students. Ultimately, Pat Sine's,
Jeff Fahnoe's, Dr. Hofstetter's, and Paul Hyde's graduate course experiences have facilitated
the improvement of instruction through my desire to effectively
integrate educational technology trends into the classroom to broaden and
enhance the Visual Art and Technology Education curriculums as well as obtain
emerging information with regards to recent technological advancements.