One
of the goals at the Dover Air Force Base Middle School for the 2001-2002
academic year is to increase student achievement through data analysis and the
implementation of team-teaching.
Currently serving in my fifth year as an active teacher representative on our
School's Improvement Plan (SIP) committee, I am well aware of the importance of
providing students with an atmosphere that promotes as well as enhances learning
for all, and generating interest in education throughout the community.
With recent discussion and implementation of Delaware's Accountability
program, schools statewide, are revisiting their ability to produce students
who excel across the curriculum ... and, on the DSTP (Delaware State Testing
Program). Focusing on Reading, Writing, and Math assessments in grades 3, 5, 8,
and 10, schools will be evaluated, ranked, and rewarded according to their overall delivery
of instruction and their demonstration of quality assessment programs. Thought to be
solely responsible for educating students in their respective subjects, teachers
within these core areas (Social Studies and Science to follow) are being
pressured to ensure that no child is 'left behind' and that the majority of
students within a school meet or exceed the state standards. However, within the Air Base
Middle School walls, it is not just these 'select few' who have responded to educating
our children, but every member of the instructional staff.
By
delivering cross-curricular enhancements and interdisciplinary connections to
providing fair assessment and remediation services, all teachers are responsible
for the child's total educational experience. Having received
excellent guidance and encouragement in the delivery of interdisciplinary
lessons during my Art Education studies at Westminster College coupled with my
personal experiences in the business sector, this imperative connection has
always been present in my Visual Art and later, my Technology Education lessons.
Nevertheless, the University of Delaware's Master of Instruction program has
refined my individual strengths, extracted my program weaknesses, and built upon
a foundation to provide me with opportunities for delivering innovative,
instructional approaches in my classrooms as well as others' through the
team-teaching concept.
Deeply
rooted in the first Project UPDATE course, TCED 581: Technology Education
Workshop, the idea of teaching inventions and innovations through an
integrated science, math, and technology curriculum was presented to our
Delaware team of teachers. These teacher training sessions enabled
kindergarten through middle school teachers to establish real-world connections
to their students' environment through enhanced Design and Make Activities;
each activity would be based upon some interdisciplinary concept. A
child's favorite story, a significant event in American history, or a
travel-oriented theme served as possible springboards for the three levels (K-2,
3-5, and 6-8) of Contextual Learning Units (CLUs). Developed by teachers
for teachers, each and every lesson provided a practical rationale for the
delivery of science, math, and technology integrated education, and further
aided in my interest for an improved and enhanced educational experience for
every one of my students.
Prior
to my M.I. experience, the CLU An American History Theme Park afforded me
the opportunity to teach simple machines, structural models, mechanisms, visual
brochure design, electricity, needs assessment, alternative energy, cooking and
preservation techniques, forces and motion, and communication systems. The
aforementioned list identifies a select few, yet nearly forty more related concepts
exist. Embedded within each technical lesson were numerous moments for
addressing the historical contributions of political movements and individuals
as well as the necessity for writing, drawing, and documentation.
Participation in the remaining UPDATE courses, &
TCED 592: Curriculum Construction - Extended Theory and Practice
and &
TCED 691: Evaluation in Technology Education - Assessing Student
Capability, coupled with the task of developing curriculum for ASME
(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) forced me to view not only the
structure of curricular tools from the vantage points of a teacher, student, and
community member, but also encouraged me to reflect upon the implementation of
appropriate/meaningful assessment strategies that would benefit all .. student,
educator, and community (business sector).
Building
upon recommendations from engineers nationwide, lessons were developed that
emphasized the critical importance of providing community involvement,
especially from the business sector, in exposing middle school students to
possible career pathways. Supporting efforts and beliefs to create lessons
addressing multiple skill levels while emphasizing the importance of mathematic
connections to the real world, the ASME IDEAS
series evolved and was made available to teachers as a resource via the World
Wide Web. However, it was during the Summer of 2000 that I had the
distinct opportunity to learn from two individuals who would demonstrate ways to
assess a child's needs in Mathematics as well as provide for the
infusion of educational technology strategies to satisfy these needs and others.
Martha
Wilson and Marti McCormick team-taught &
EDUC 667: Introduction to Technology
in Middle School Mathematics. Beginning with basic concepts and
building to elaborate, and oftentimes, confusing concepts, this duo addressed
National and State Mathematic Standards throughout our two-week, hands-on
lab. I immediately wished to share my experience of the UPDATE theme park
unit so as to create an expanded, yet tailored program of study for my
Technology Education students. My hopes were to develop a semester-long
course that would begin with the introduction of elementary concepts in science,
math, and technology, and then blossom into a simplified study of physics and
trigonometry ... all the while, completely engaging all students!
Nothing
short of a mini-miracle, both Marti and Martha introduced me to websites,
contacts, software, and equipment that provided aid as I pursued my
intense quest. They further recommended opportunities for my evaluation of
software programs and possible websites so as not to teach down to the students,
but to allow them to rise to my high standards while achieving their individual,
student goals. Since my encounter with these two professionals, and the
countless other experiences that I have had as a result of my studies at the
University of Delaware, my Amusement Park Physics unit (PRISM) has evolved into
a grant receiving program, a frequently requested module within the Technology
Education course, and a year-long exploration for a group of sixth, seventh, and
eighth grade students in my Technology Student Advisory. During our
culminating physics lab at HersheyPark later this school year, my students will
have the opportunity to utilize some of the software and equipment that Marti
and Martha helped me locate and implement into my dream for the development of a
completely integrated course addressing all core academic and essential arts
curricular areas. Their insight and guided experience permits me to
deliver innovative approaches in interdisciplinary studies and provide fair
assessment for all of my students.